On 4/15/26 9:27 AM, Ales Musil wrote: >>>> + ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, in_stage, priority, >>>> + "from_evpn_vtep", "next;", lflow_ref); >>>> + ovn_lflow_add(lflows, od, out_stage, priority, >>>> + "to_evpn_vtep", egress_action, lflow_ref); >>>> >>> nit: Should we also match on "ip" for both? >>> >> The LLM I used for assistance suggested that too but I decided against >> it. While conntrack won't work anyway on non-IP packets (e.g., ARP) >> what do we gain by matching on "ip"? >> > Just for consistency with the other skips. But I'm fine with leaving it > as is.
Ack, I'll think about it some more before posting v2. Thanks again! Regards, Dumitru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
