On 5/21/26 10:41 AM, David Marchand wrote: > This comment is now covered by the recent comment that the mac= syntax > does not work unless using the dpdk-probe-at-init option. > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst | 5 ----- > Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst b/Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst > index 5d6bf94cdb..c4ab0091b3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst > +++ b/Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst > @@ -68,11 +68,6 @@ is suggested:: > all available devices (including PCI devices) be probed at initialization > (setting ``dpdk-probe-at-init`` to true). > > - Hotplugging physical interfaces is not supported using the above syntax. > - This is expected to change with the release of DPDK v18.05. For > information > - on hotplugging physical interfaces, you should instead refer to > - :ref:`port-hotplug`. > - > After the DPDK ports get added to switch, a polling thread continuously polls > DPDK devices and consumes 100% of the core, as can be checked from ``top`` > and > ``ps`` commands:: > diff --git a/Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst > b/Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst > index 487a5ba938..7ce85ebfc6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst > +++ b/Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst > @@ -258,8 +258,6 @@ traffic in OVS-DPDK because the checksum validation of > tunnel packets is > offloaded to the NIC. Also enabling Rx checksum may slightly reduce the > performance of non-tunnel traffic, specifically for smaller size packet. > > -.. _port-hotplug: > - > Hotplugging > ----------- >
Thanks David. Pushed to main branch. I didn't backport as it's just doc cleanup but can if requested. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
