On 6/11/26 12:53 PM, Ales Musil wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 4:47 PM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> When northd handles in a single iteration the following transactions:
>> A. port group deletion (e.g., name="pg")
>> B. port group addition (same name as the deleted group, i.e., "pg" but
>>    with a new UUID) with a logical switch port.
>>
>> it should correctly reconcile the SB contents, the resulting SB port
>> group contents should include the "recreated" group too.
>>
>> That wasn't the case because the deleted name was added to the
>> stale_sb_port_groups set and not removed from it when processing the new
>> group record.
>>
>> Also, make sure we first process all deletions and then all updates (and
>> additions) in order to avoid pruning issues.
>>
>> Fixes: a1d82e9fa11e ("northd: Process port_group changes incrementally.")
>> Reported-at: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/FDP-3966
>> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
>> ---

> Looks good to me, thanks.
> 
> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]>
> 

Hi Ales,

Thanks for the review!

Applied to main, 26.03 and 25.09.

Regards,
Dumitru

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to