Hi Rosemarie, Dumitru,

Thanks for your reviews.




Em qua., 22 de jul. de 2026 às 05:06, Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> On 7/21/26 10:38 PM, Rosemarie O'Riorden wrote:
> > On 7/17/26 7:52 PM, Lucas Vargas Dias wrote:
> >> The 'ic-route-filter-tag' option on a Logical_Router_Port used to accept
> >> only a single route-tag: the learned route's tag was matched against the
> >> option value with a plain strcmp(), so a comma-separated value would
> >> never match any real tag and the filter would silently do nothing.
> >>
> >> Parse the option as a comma-separated list instead, building an sset of
> >> tags and matching each learned route's tag against it, mirroring the
> >> behavior already used by the 'ic-route-filter-adv' and
> >> 'ic-route-filter-learn' prefix filters.  A single tag keeps working
> >> exactly as before.
> >>
> >> The documentation is updated to describe the list form and the test in
> >> tests/ovn-ic.at is extended to verify that a route is filtered when its
> >> tag is one of several listed tags, and learned again when it is not.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lucas Vargas Dias <[email protected]>
> >
> > Hi Lucas!
> >
>
> Hi Lucas, Rosemarie,
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch and for the review!
>
> > I think this should be part of a patch set along with your patch
> > "ic: Add allowlist filter for learned IC route tags."
> >
>
> Yes, grouping related patches together in sets makes reviewer's lives
> easier.
>

I agree.




>
> >> ---
> >>  ic/ovn-ic.c     |  9 +++++++--
> >>  ovn-nb.xml      |  7 ++++---
> >>  tests/ovn-ic.at | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/ic/ovn-ic.c b/ic/ovn-ic.c
> >> index f07e74866..ae77990e7 100644
> >> --- a/ic/ovn-ic.c
> >> +++ b/ic/ovn-ic.c
> >> @@ -2370,6 +2370,10 @@ sync_learned_routes(struct ic_context *ctx,
> >>              route_filter_tag = "";
> >>          }
> >>
> >> +        /* The filter tag option accepts a comma-separated list of
> tags. */
> >> +        struct sset filter_tags = SSET_INITIALIZER(&filter_tags);
> >> +        sset_from_delimited_string(&filter_tags, route_filter_tag,
> ",");
> >
> > The name of the variable route_filter_tag should probably be updated now
> > that it's a delimited string intended to hold a list. "route_tag_filter"
> > actually works fine instead.
> >

>> +
> >>          isb_route_key =
> icsbrec_route_index_init_row(ctx->icsbrec_route_by_ts);
> >>          icsbrec_route_index_set_transit_switch(isb_route_key,
> >>                                                 isb_pb->transit_switch);
> >> @@ -2393,9 +2397,9 @@ sync_learned_routes(struct ic_context *ctx,
> >>
> >>              const char *isb_route_tag =
> smap_get(&isb_route->external_ids,
> >>                                                   "ic-route-tag");
> >> -            if (isb_route_tag  && !strcmp(isb_route_tag,
> route_filter_tag)) {
> >> +            if (isb_route_tag && sset_contains(&filter_tags,
> isb_route_tag)) {
> >>                  VLOG_DBG("Skip learning route %s -> %s as its route
> tag "
> >> -                         "[%s] is filtered by the filter tag [%s] of
> TS LRP ",
> >> +                         "[%s] is filtered by the filter tags [%s] of
> TS LRP ",
> >>                           isb_route->ip_prefix, isb_route->nexthop,
> >>                           isb_route_tag, route_filter_tag);
> >>                  continue;
> >> @@ -2465,6 +2469,7 @@ sync_learned_routes(struct ic_context *ctx,
> >>              }
> >>          }
> >>          icsbrec_route_index_destroy_row(isb_route_key);
> >> +        sset_destroy(&filter_tags);
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      /* Delete extra learned routes. */
> >> diff --git a/ovn-nb.xml b/ovn-nb.xml
> >> index 33a6dc676..a13c2083c 100644
> >> --- a/ovn-nb.xml
> >> +++ b/ovn-nb.xml
> >> @@ -4573,9 +4573,10 @@ or
> >>        <column name="options" key="ic-route-filter-tag"
> >>                type='{"type": "string"}'>
> >>          <p>
> >> -          This option expects a name of a filtered route-tag that's
> present
> >> -          in the Logical Router Port. If set, it causes any route
> learned by
> >> -          the Logical Router Port with the <code>route-tag</code>
> present in
> >> +          This option expects a comma-separated list of filtered
> route-tags
> >> +          that's present in the Logical Router Port. If set, it causes
> any
> >> +          route learned by the Logical Router Port with a
> >> +          <code>route-tag</code> matching one of the listed tags,
> present in
> >
> > It might be a good idea to change the name of this key in the database.
> > As I mentioned earlier, "ic-route-filter-tag" implies one tag, and maybe
> > "ic-route-tag-filter" would be better.
> >
>
I agree that  "ic-route-filter-tag" implies one tag.But, I think it could
confuse
the user with two configurations to do the same thing.
Also, in the future, "ic-route-filter-tag" could be deprecated and just the
new option
will be used.

So, I would like to keep the same config name. I understand that's an
improvement in the configuration
and avoids future work.


Regards,
Lucas

> However this would cause backwards-compatibility issues and both would
> > need to be kept for some time, so it's difficult to say which option is
> > better. What do you think? Maybe @Dumitru has some input.
> >
>
> We've done that in the past, supporting two versions of config keys for
> a while for backwards compatibility.
>
> In this case though, I'd be OK with keeping the "ic-route-filter-tag"
> key.  I understand Rosemarie's point of it being slightly
> (grammatically) incorrect but we have a bunch of other places in our
> config where we do that.  E.g., in the NB schema:
>
> "Load_Balancer_Group": {
>     "columns": {
>         "name": {"type": "string"},
>         "load_balancer": {"type": {"key": {"type": "uuid",
>                                            "refTable": "Load_Balancer",
>                                            "refType": "weak"},
>                          "min": 0,
>                          "max": "unlimited"}}},
>
> For maintenance ease, I'd just reuse the current key.  I won't oppose a
> new key either if you guys agree to do that but I don't agree with
> "ic-route-tag-filter" being necessarily better, we have a bunch of other
> "ic-route-filter-*" options already.
>
>
> >>            the external_ids register of the advertised route entry in
> the
> >>            <ref table="Route" db="OVN_IC_Southbound"/> table of the
> >>            <ref db="OVN_IC_Southbound"/> database, will be filtered and
> not
> >> diff --git a/tests/ovn-ic.at b/tests/ovn-ic.at
> >> index f9fceac8d..f3bdc816f 100644
> >> --- a/tests/ovn-ic.at
> >> +++ b/tests/ovn-ic.at
> >> @@ -3299,6 +3299,29 @@ OVS_WAIT_FOR_OUTPUT([ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl
> lr-route-list lr11 | grep 192.168 |
> >>  192.168.1.0/24 169.254.103.22
> >>  ])
> >>
> >> +# Filter using a comma-separated list of tags that includes vpc1.
> >> +# The vpc1-tagged route (169.254.103.12) must be filtered out.
> >> +ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl set logical_router_port lrp-lr11-tspeer
> options:ic-route-filter-tag=vpc0,vpc1,vpc2
> >> +
> >> +OVS_WAIT_FOR_OUTPUT([ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl lr-route-list lr11 | grep
> 192.168 |
> >> +             grep learned | awk '{print $1, $2}' | sort ], [0], [dnl
> >> +192.168.0.0/24 169.254.101.2
> >> +192.168.0.0/24 169.254.102.2
> >> +192.168.1.0/24 169.254.103.22
> >> +])
> >> +
> >> +# Change the filter to a list that does not include vpc1.
> >> +# The vpc1-tagged route (169.254.103.12) must be learned again.
> >> +ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl set logical_router_port lrp-lr11-tspeer
> options:ic-route-filter-tag=vpc0,vpc2
> >> +
> >> +OVS_WAIT_FOR_OUTPUT([ovn_as az1 ovn-nbctl lr-route-list lr11 | grep
> 192.168 |
> >> +             grep learned | awk '{print $1, $2}' | sort ], [0], [dnl
> >> +192.168.0.0/24 169.254.101.2
> >> +192.168.0.0/24 169.254.102.2
> >> +192.168.0.0/24 169.254.103.12
> >> +192.168.1.0/24 169.254.103.22
> >> +])
> >> +
> >>  OVN_CLEANUP_IC([az1], [az2])
> >>
> >>  AT_CLEANUP
> >
>
> Regards,
> Dumitru
>
>

-- 




_‘Esta mensagem é direcionada apenas para os endereços constantes no 
cabeçalho inicial. Se você não está listado nos endereços constantes no 
cabeçalho, pedimos-lhe que desconsidere completamente o conteúdo dessa 
mensagem e cuja cópia, encaminhamento e/ou execução das ações citadas estão 
imediatamente anuladas e proibidas’._


* **‘Apesar do Magazine Luiza tomar 
todas as precauções razoáveis para assegurar que nenhum vírus esteja 
presente nesse e-mail, a empresa não poderá aceitar a responsabilidade por 
quaisquer perdas ou danos causados por esse e-mail ou por seus anexos’.*



_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to