On 8/22/26 2:09 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 23:45:41 +0200 Ilya Maximets wrote: >> Unfortunately, this needs a rebase now that a conflicting change >> for skb_zerocopy() was merged: > > Ugh, I was supposed to merge this first, wasn't I? Sorry.
Not a huge deal, I guess, the conflict is mechanical and the patches are simple. I can take care of manual backports once we get the 'failed to apply' emails. Just a bit of busy work. > I was hoping for Willem to TAL since skb_tx_error() is a tx ZC > thing, now I realized that he wasn't CCed :S (please do so on v4) FWIW, I CCed a few people on v1 to have a conversation about a proper fix, but that wasn't fruitful. So, if I were Norbert, I wouldn't include them for the new versions either as doing so always feels like me being annoying. :) For now, the plan is to get v4 of these targeted fixes into net and stable and then remove skb_tx_error() entirely once net-next is open, as it seems to have lost all of its prior meaning. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
