> On Jul 27, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:30:49PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org>
>> ---
>> ofproto/ofproto-dpif-rid.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-rid.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-rid.c
>> index d546b150b938..26c2357007b2 100644
>> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-rid.c
>> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-rid.c
>> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ frozen_state_hash(const struct frozen_state *state)
>>         hash = hash_bytes64(ALIGNED_CAST(const uint64_t *, 
>> state->action_set),
>>                             state->action_set_len, hash);
>>     }
>> +    hash = hash_int(state->ofpacts_len, hash);
>>     if (state->ofpacts_len) {
>>         hash = hash_bytes64(ALIGNED_CAST(const uint64_t *, state->ofpacts),
>>                             state->ofpacts_len, hash);
> 
> Can you explain the benefit of this change?  hash_bytes64() already uses
> the number of bytes hashed as one of the inputs to the hash.

hash_bytes64() is only called if the action length is non-zero.  However, I was 
on the fence about making this change, since it wasn't clear if it would be 
that valuable.  The main reason was just to make it consistent with how 
"action_set" is handled right above it. 

I'm happy to drop the patch if you prefer.

--Justin


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to