On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Could you suggest another dp_packet_batch_XXX() name (which can be exposed
> to the end user) for the function that doesn't check the boundaries instead
> of 'add_unsafe', if you think it is not accurate?

How about using an existing API, dp_packet_batch_refill()
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to