On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com> wrote: > > Could you suggest another dp_packet_batch_XXX() name (which can be exposed > to the end user) for the function that doesn't check the boundaries instead > of 'add_unsafe', if you think it is not accurate?
How about using an existing API, dp_packet_batch_refill() _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev