On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:16 PM, <wang.qia...@zte.com.cn> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Whether we could add a port property to logical flow? port property have > value of "normal" or logical port name. If the port property is "normal" > means this logical flow should be allocated to all HVs, if port property > is a name of logical_port, means this logical flow is related to specific > port, not need allocated to all computer nodes. > > I think this manner may reduce a great mount of flows in single HV. > > Thanks. > > > > > > > 王前宇10110202 > 2017/09/14 10:39 > > 收件人： az...@ovn.org, b...@ovn.org, zhou...@gmail.com, > 抄送： d...@openvswitch.org, XuRong037997/user/zte_ltd@zte_ltd, > ZhouHuiJing033341/user/zte_ltd@zte_ltd > 主题： [ovs-dev] [RFC] Question about ovn-controller performance > > I configure 5 networks, every network have about 80 ports, the total ports > is 400, all in same security group. > > Can you please clear the remote group match on the security group rules (if remote group is configured) and see the cpu usage of ovn-controllers? Even we noticed similar behavior.
Thanks Numan When I bind some port on HVs, the ovn-controller is always running with > 100% cpu, and the total openflow table entities in ovs is more than > 300,000. Most of the entities is table 52, worked as src ip filter. > > Could some one tell me how to reduce the flows or how to make > ovn-controller work more efficient or do some options to reduce the table > number of acls? > > The attachment is the dump of ovn-sb. > > Thanks. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > d...@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
