On 2017/11/2 4:19, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 08:43:20AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
>> On 10/30/2017 06:13 PM, fukaige wrote:
>>> From: Kaige Fu <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> IFF_NO_QUEUE is checked twice. This cause a situation
>>> that HAVE_IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined no matter whether
>>> the flag IFF_NO_QUEUE is defined in kernel or not.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kaige Fu <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>  datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 ---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h 
>>> b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>> index a5d4ee8..3c3cf42 100644
>>> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>> @@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ struct net;
>>>  #define IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE 0
>>>  #endif
>>> -#ifndef IFF_NO_QUEUE
>>> -#define IFF_NO_QUEUE       0
>>> -#endif
>>>  #ifndef IFF_OPENVSWITCH
>>>  #define IFF_OPENVSWITCH 0
>>>  #endif
>>>
>> Looks correct to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Greg Rose <[email protected]>
> Thanks Kaige and Greg.  I applied this to master.  Let me know if it
> should be backported.
>
> .

Thanks for applying this patch. It should be backported to 
branch-2.8/branch-2.7/branch-2.6.

-- 
Thanks
Kaige Fu


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to