On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:56:16PM +0800, Guoshuai Li wrote: > > > >On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:18:26PM +0800, Guoshuai Li wrote: > >>rate limiting may be implemented in other ways (such as nova/libvirt), > >>ovs never enable policing. I think ovs need not control qdisc, such as > >>remove > >>qdisk added by other. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Guoshuai Li <l...@dtdream.com> > >>Signed-off-by: huweihua <h...@dtdream.com> > >>--- > >> > >>v2: Fix cannot disable policing when set ingress_policing_rate to 0. > >I am not sure that this is the right solution. I am willing to try it > >anyway and see if anything breaks. > > > >However, I do not understand the sign-off chain. Who is the author of > >this patch? Who is the other person who signed off on it? > This problem is discovered by huweihua and he gives the solution, > Then I change it and tested. > Is it better to use "Co-authored-by"?
I think so. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
