On 12/15/2017 09:39 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs and a few different destinations for >>> traffic from VM? >>> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs added to balanced OVS bonding and just a >>> few different packet flows? >>> What if we have HW NICs with small number of TX queues (like VFs) and XPS >>> is working? >>> We may actually stuck with non-working virtual interface in all above cases. >>> >>> IMHO, this feature should be marked as experimental until we don't have >>> proper solution >>> for that stuck mbufs in HW rings. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >> How about using rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup() ? > This API currently implemented only by igb driver. > This will not be much useful. >
Ah ok, pity - it seems like it could be used as part of a solution for this. Maybe it will be more widely implemented in the future. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
