Hi,

Do anyone sees any issue with the patch below ?

Warm Regards,
Vishal

-----Original Message-----
From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] 
On Behalf Of Vishal Deep Ajmera
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 5:25 PM
To: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH V2] ofproto-dpif-xlate: Incorrect handling of errors 
in group action processing

As per OpenFlow v1.3 specification, when an action list contains a group action 
a copy of the packet is passed to the group for processing by the group. This 
means that if there is an error encountered during group processing, only the 
copy of packet should be dropped, but subsequent actions in the action list 
should be executed on the original packet.

Additionally, if the group type is "ALL", each action bucket of the group 
should process a copy of the packet. If there is an error while processing one 
bucket other buckets should still be processed.

Example 1:
table=0,in_port=tap0 actions=output:tap1,group:10,output:tap2

Even if any error is encountered while processing the group action, the packet 
should still be forwarded to ports tap1 and tap2.

Example 2:
group_id=1,type=all,bucket=actions=output:tap1,bucket=actions=encap(eth)

Even if processing the action in the second bucket fails because the packet 
already has an Ethernet header, the other copy of the packet should still be 
processed by the first bucket and output to port tap1.

Currently the error handling in OVS does not comply with those rules. When any 
group bucket execution fails the error is recorded in the so-called 
"translation context" which is global for the processing of the original 
packet. Once an error is recorded, OVS skips processing subsequent buckets and 
installs a drop action in the datapath even if parts of the action list were 
previously processed successfully.

This patch clears the error flag after any bucket of a group is executed.
This way the error encountered in processing any bucket of the group will not 
impact other actions of action-list or other buckets of the group.

Errors which are system limits to protect translation from taking too long time 
or too much space are not cleared. Instead drop action is installed for them.

Signed-off-by: Vishal Deep Ajmera <vishal.deep.ajm...@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Keshav Gupta <keshav.gu...@ericsson.com>
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c index 
9b3a2f2..7893c0e 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
@@ -4065,6 +4065,23 @@ xlate_group_bucket(struct xlate_ctx *ctx, struct 
ofputil_bucket *bucket,
      * the group bucket freezes translation, the actions after the group action
      * must continue processing with the original, not the frozen packet! */
    ctx->exit = false;
+
+    /* Context error in a bucket should not impact processing of other buckets
+     * or actions. This is similar to cloning a packet for group buckets.
+     * There is no need to restore the error back to old value due to the fact
+     * that we actually processed group action which can happen only when there
+     * is no previous context error.
+     *
+     * Exception to above is errors which are system limits to protect 
translation
+     * from running too long or occupy too much space. These errors should not 
be
+     * masked. XLATE_RECURSION_TOO_DEEP, XLATE_TOO_MANY_RESUBMITS and
+     * XLATE_STACK_TOO_DEEP fall in this category.
+     */
+    if (ctx->error == XLATE_TOO_MANY_MPLS_LABELS ||
+        ctx->error == XLATE_UNSUPPORTED_PACKET_TYPE) {
+        /* reset the error and continue processing other buckets */
+        ctx->error = XLATE_OK;
+    }
}

static void
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to