On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:50:00 -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Per-port sockets help OVS to improve fairness, so that a single busy > port can't monopolize all slow-path resources. We can't just throw that > away. If there's a problem with too many netlink sockets, let's come up > with a solution, but it can't be to eliminate fairness entirely.
The main problem with this is the sockets are dedicated to particular ports. With high number of ports, the number of sockets raises to such high value that it stops helping performance anyway. There's not much point of having thousands opened sockets per CPU, we'll not be able to utilize them anyway. Having dedicated sockets for each port is wasteful, especially if one port is very busy with upcalls and other ports are mostly idle. (And if many ports are busy with many upcalls, we're in performance troubles anyway.) It would make sense to share the sockets between the ports. I'd like to understand more about the thoughts behind the fairness. Why should not a single busy port use all slow-path resources in case other ports are idle? Thanks, Jiri _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev