I agree with having the target specified during make and not during configure. There is no reason to re-do the whole configure process (as Alin mentioned that it is particularly slow on Windows) only to change the target version.
Thanks, Alin Balutoiu > -----Original Message----- > From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev- > boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Anand Kumar > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 6:34 AM > To: Shashank Ram <r...@vmware.com>; Alin Serdean > <aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com>; d...@openvswitch.org > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Support to selectively > compile targets > > Hi, > > My thoughts are with Shashank on this, it makes sense to have 1 configure and > 1 > make command to build a particular target, instead of having flexibility to > specify multiple targets. > > Thanks, > Anand Kumar > > On 2/8/18, 10:56 AM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of > Shashank Ram" <ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of > r...@vmware.com> wrote: > > > > > > ________________________________________ > From: aserd...@ovn.org <aserd...@ovn.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 10:43 AM > To: Shashank Ram; aserd...@ovn.org; d...@openvswitch.org > Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Support to selectively > compile targets > > Trimming the message a bit. > > -----Mesaj original----- > De la: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org > [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] În numele Shashank Ram > Trimis: Thursday, February 8, 2018 7:50 PM > Către: aserd...@ovn.org; d...@openvswitch.org > Subiect: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] datapath-windows: Support to selectively > compile targets > > Hi Alin, thanks for the review. > I personally feel we should be consistent and run configure, and have a > single make command to build both user space and kernel. What part did you > find complicated? > [Alin Serdean] I.e. if I configure to target 8. And after I need to target > 10 I need to do a reconfigure (similar, for debug and or other platforms). > [SR]: In an automated environment, this shouldn't happen. > For local compilation, you should be able to manually compile the kernel. > > The configure part is particularly slow on Windows. > For convenience the old part with selecting Debug/Release and > trying to build for all the compilers found in the system is still there, > so > building both > userspace and kernel will still be in a single command. > I don't see a huge issue to specify two or more make commands to build a > particular target of the kernel > via the shell. > [SR]: I don't think its a big deal either, but its more convenient to run > 1 > configure and 1 > make command. > > I prefer to keep this as is for now and wait for more reviews. > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > d...@openvswitch.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs- > 2Ddev&d=DwIFBA&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=Q5z9tBe- > nAOpE7LIHSPV8uy5- > 437agMXvkeHHMkR8Us&m=fKK6KZRD0tZEfwHzLhMsabCH5aXzzYiRP- > pJR20Xj9o&s=nEl_7Q-LhJ74AdsiY85DjA-kWy0uESr5DyFrWDQYKjs&e= > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > d...@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev