"Stokes, Ian" <ian.sto...@intel.com> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Scheurich [mailto:jan.scheur...@ericsson.com] >> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 5:38 PM >> To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org >> Cc: i.maxim...@samsung.com >> Subject: RE: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] dpif-netdev: Detailed performance >> stats for PMDs >> >> > Checkpatch reports the following: >> > >> > WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator >> > #560 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev-perf.h:113: >> > uint64_t cycles; /* Number of TSC cycles spent in it/ms. >> */ >> > >> > WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator >> > #563 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev-perf.h:116: >> > uint32_t pkts; /* Packets processed in iteration/ms. */ >> > >> > WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator >> > #564 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev-perf.h:117: >> > uint32_t upcalls; /* Number of upcalls in iteration/ms. */ >> > >> > WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator >> > #565 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev-perf.h:118: >> > uint32_t upcall_cycles; /* Cycles spent in upcalls in >> iteration/ms. */ >> > >> > WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator >> > #566 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev-perf.h:119: >> > uint32_t batches; /* Number of rx batches in iteration/ms. >> */ >> > >> > WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator >> > #567 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev-perf.h:120: >> > uint32_t max_vhost_qfill; /* Maximum fill level encountered in >> it/ms. */ >> >> These warnings are pretty silly, given that they complain about comments. >> Somebody should improve checkpatch.py to skip checking comments for coding >> style! For now I have modified these comments to avoid the warnings.
Thanks for the report. I'll see if there's a quick enhancement I can make. > > In this case I agree, it probably doesn't make sense. > >> > WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator >> > #1218 FILE: lib/dpif-netdev.c:3396: >> > int rem_qlen = 0, *qlen_p= NULL; >> >> OK, this one was real. :-) 1/7 isn't bad, right :) >> >> > > + } else { >> > > + ds_put_format(str, >> > > + " Rx packets: %12"PRIu64"\n", >> > > + 0UL); >> > >> > Will cause compilation error ovs OVS travis >> > >> > lib/dpif-netdev-perf.c:194:17: error: format '%llu' expects argument >> > of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned >> int' [-Werror=format=] >> > 0UL); >> > >> > See link below for further info >> > >> > https://travis-ci.org/istokes/ovs/jobs/354225095 >> > >> > > + } >> > > + if (tx_packets > 0) { >> > > + ds_put_format(str, >> > > + " Tx packets: %12"PRIu64" (%.0f Kpps)\n" >> > > + " Tx batches: %12"PRIu64" (%.2f pkts/batch)" >> > > + "\n", >> > > + tx_packets, (tx_packets / duration) / 1000, >> > > + tx_batches, 1.0 * tx_packets / tx_batches); >> > > + } else { >> > > + ds_put_format(str, >> > > + " Tx packets: %12"PRIu64"\n" >> > > + "\n", >> > > + 0UL); >> > >> > Same as above. >> >> Fixed the constants to 0ULL. Hope that does the trick. >> >> > > +/* This function clears the PMD performance counters from within >> > > +the PMD >> > > + * thread or from another thread when the PMD thread is not >> > > +executing its >> > > + * poll loop. */ >> > > void >> > > -pmd_perf_stats_clear(struct pmd_perf_stats *s) >> > > +pmd_perf_stats_clear_lock(struct pmd_perf_stats *s) >> > > + OVS_REQUIRES(pmd->stats_mutex) >> > >> > Will cause compilation error for OVS Travis build >> > >> > lib/dpif-netdev-perf.c:365:18: error: use of undeclared identifier 'pmd' >> > OVS_REQUIRES(pmd->stats_mutex) >> > >> > https://travis-ci.org/istokes/ovs/jobs/354225106 >> >> Yes, that was a leftover that normal compilation with GCC didn't catch. >> Should read OVS_REQUIRES(s->stats_mutex). >> >> Will include the fixes in v10. >> >> Thanks, Jan > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > d...@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev