On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:45:41 -0700 Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > These caused the test to fail. > > CC: Jakub Sitnicki <j...@redhat.com> > Fixes: 984c7d5ea8fe ("ovn-northd: Propagate dynamic addresses to port group > address sets.") > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > --- > tests/ovn.at | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at > index 17c740aa2352..1b25b6e4d6b9 100644 > --- a/tests/ovn.at > +++ b/tests/ovn.at > @@ -10361,10 +10361,10 @@ ovn-nbctl set Logical_Switch ls1 \ > > dnl Check if updated address got propagated to the port group address sets > AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl get Address_Set pg1_ip4 addresses], > - [0], [[["10.11.0.2", "10.2.0.2"]] > + [0], [[["10.1.0.2", "10.2.0.2"]] > ]) > AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl get Address_Set pg1_ip6 addresses], > - [0], [[["2001:db8:11::ff:fe00:1", "2001:db8:2::ff:fe00:2"]] > + [0], [[["2001:db8:1::ff:fe00:1", "2001:db8:2::ff:fe00:2"]] > ]) > > AT_CLEANUP
Oops, these weren't typos. It fails because the series depends on Mark's IPAM changes: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/947155/ Without it the dynamic addresses don't get updated when subnet/prefix for the switch changes. FWIW, I've mentioned it in the cover letter: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-July/350143.html -Jakub _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev