Hi Simon,

On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 11:23:30 +0200
Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com> wrote:

> Hi Jakub,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 04:37:49PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> > If a logical switch port belongs to a port group and has dynamic
> > addresses assigned, propagate the addresses to the auto-generated
> > address sets for the port group.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <j...@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Han Zhou <hzh...@ebay.com>
> > ---
> >  ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  tests/ovn.at            | 59 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)  
> 
> The test added by this patch, which is now present in the master branch,
> seems to fail.
> 
> https://travis-ci.org/openvswitch/ovs/jobs/410550769

Thanks for the heads-up. These patches depend on another patch that is
still under review. Hence the failure. I've already notified Ben, who
he has proposed a fix-up similar to yours:

https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-August/350390.html

-Jakub
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to