On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com> wrote:
> On 1 August 2018 at 11:31, Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Or, Thanks Ben,
>>
>> On 1 August 2018 at 08:43, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > This series comes to address the case to set (encap) and match (decap)
>>> > also the tos and ttl fields of TC based IP tunnels. This happens e.g
>>> > due to inherit setup of tunnel port for tos or due to specific OF rule.
>>> >
>>> > The series is rebased over Jianbo's patches for QinQ [1]
>>>
>>> FWIW - note that v2 was actually rebased to the master where Jianbo's
>>> work
>>> is already applied
>>
>>
>> I have also reviewed these patches, tested that travis-ci is happy with
>> everything when applied on top of
>> 185b13f228ac ("ovn: Add Meter and Meter_Band tables to the NB and SB
>> databases."), which was the most recent
>> travis-ci-clean commit in the master branch yesterday, and Netronome has
>> performed some testing in the lab.
>>
>> Overall I am happy with these patches and plan to apply them later today
>> after one final run through travis-ci after rebasing onto the current master
>> branch (which is not travis-ci-clean :( [See: "Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3]
>> ovn-northd: Propagate dynamic addresses to port group address sets."]).> Thanks again Or, I have applied this series to master. Thank you. So how is the stable process @ ovs goes? is that documented, where? e.g b4496fc "lib/tc: Handle ttl for ipv6 too" is a bug fix, should/who I ask for stable inclusion? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
