On 10 Jul 2018, at 23:45, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 07:03:55PM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group
based policy (GBP) option enabled can not coexist on the same
destination UDP port.
In theory, VXLAN tunnel with and without GBP enables can be
multiplexed on the same UDP port as long as different VNI's are
used. However currently OVS does not support this, hence this patch
to
check for this condition.
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>
Thanks for the patch, and sorry that I'm so slow.
Does this support the case where, in a single database transaction, a
GBP VXLAN tunnel is removed and a non-GBP VXLAN tunnel is created that
would otherwise interfere with one another (and the converse case)?
If
so, could that be included in the test?
"sparse" doesn't like the initialization strategy:
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1207:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1211:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1215:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1219:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1220:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1221:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1225:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1229:9: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
../lib/netdev-vport.c:1261:13: error: Using plain integer as NULL
pointer
Hi Ben some of this is existing code, however, which version of Sparse
are you using, as I’m not getting any error?
Thanks,
Ben.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
