On 22.01.2019 4:14, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It was deceptive for the example to imply that a seq can be declared
> directly, because the API only allows for creating a new one on the heap.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> ---
>  lib/seq.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks.
Maybe you can additionally fix the C99-style comment here to not use
a bad style inside the example.

Anyway,
Acked-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>

> diff --git a/lib/seq.h b/lib/seq.h
> index 221ab9acddc5..92743c1eb4ea 100644
> --- a/lib/seq.h
> +++ b/lib/seq.h
> @@ -77,14 +77,14 @@
>   *
>   *    struct ovs_mutex mutex;
>   *    struct ovs_list queue OVS_GUARDED_BY(mutex);
> - *    struct seq nonempty_seq;
> + *    struct seq *nonempty_seq;
>   *
>   * To add an element to the queue:
>   *
>   *    ovs_mutex_lock(&mutex);
>   *    ovs_list_push_back(&queue, ...element...);
>   *    if (ovs_list_is_singleton(&queue)) {   // The 'if' test here is 
> optional.
> - *        seq_change(&nonempty_seq);
> + *        seq_change(nonempty_seq);
>   *    }
>   *    ovs_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
>   *
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
>   *
>   *    ovs_mutex_lock(&mutex);
>   *    if (ovs_list_is_empty(&queue)) {
> - *        seq_wait(&nonempty_seq, seq_read(&nonempty_seq));
> + *        seq_wait(nonempty_seq, seq_read(nonempty_seq));
>   *    } else {
>   *        poll_immediate_wake();
>   *    }
> 
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to