On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:50:16PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: > > > On Oct 29, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > > Normally it makes sense for an active connection to be primary and a > > passive connection to be a service connection, but I've run into a corner > > case where it is better for a passive connection to be a primary > > connection. This specific case is for use with OFtest, which expects to be > > a primary controller. However, it also wants to reconnect frequently, > > which is slow for active connections because of the backoff; by > > configuring a passive, primary controller, OFtest can reconnect as > > frequently and as quickly as it wants, making the overall test much faster. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > > Nice. Have you made the necessary changes for OFtest?
I've been holding back further patches until these got in. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
