On 22.03.2019 16:08, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> Hey Eelco,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eelco Chaudron [mailto:echau...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:29 PM
>> To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
>> Cc: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; i.maxim...@samsung.com
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] dpif-netdev: split out generic lookup
>> function
>>
>> On 25 Feb 2019, at 17:18, Harry van Haaren wrote:
>>
>>> This commit splits the generic hash-lookup-verify
>>> function to its own file. In doing so, we must move
>>> some MACRO definitions to dpif-netdev.h
>>
>> Changes look good, but want to wait for some performance numbers before
>> ack’ing the series.
>>
>> Did you do any performance tests on the change? It does not seem to
>> impact much, but I’ve been surprised before.
> 
> Thanks for the review - I'll take the comments into account for the V+1.
> 
> Regarding performance, I expect there to be no performance delta with
> this patchset - it is just enabling flexibility in the dpcls infrastructure.
> 
> As presented at OvS conf last November, with the flexibility mentioned above
> we can select optimized implementations at runtime, and that is where the
> performance gains will be seen.
> 
> 
> I'll work on addressing your comments early next week - thanks again! -H

Hi Harry,

I didn't look at this series closely yet. But if you're going to prepare new
version, it'll be good to fix checkpatch issues reported by 0-day robot too:

  https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2019-February/356615.html
  https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2019-February/356616.html

BTW, commented out counters looks suspicious.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to