Hi Chris,

We missed a reply from Ben.

Thanks,
Roi


On 23/02/2019 00:31, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:10:16AM +0800, Chris Mi wrote:
>> If tunnel device dst_port is not the default one, "ovs-dpctl dump-flows"
>> will fail. The error message for vxlan is:
>>
>> netdev_linux|INFO|ioctl(SIOCGIFINDEX) on vxlan_sys_4789 device failed: No 
>> such device
>>
>> That's because when calling netdev_vport_construct() for netdev
>> vxlan_sys_xxxx, the default dst_port is used. Actually, the dst_port
>> value is in the netdev name. Use it to avoid the error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Mi <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> v1
>> ==
>>
>> Any comment about this patch? We are not sure if it is correct
>> to verify the port from the name. If it is correct, is it applicable
>> for other tunnels? Thanks!
>>
>> v2
>> ==
>>
>> Apply the same fix to other tunnel types according to Flavio Leitner's
>> comment.
> 
> Thanks for the patch!
> 
> It looks to me that if 'name' and 'dpif_port' are exactly the same, then
> this code will read past the null terminator in 'dpif_port':
> +    if (!strncmp(name, dpif_port, strlen(dpif_port))) {
> +        p = name + strlen(dpif_port) + 1;
> +        port = atoi(p);
> +    }
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben.

thanks

> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.openvswitch.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fovs-dev&amp;data=02%7C01%7Croid%40mellanox.com%7C8f2606644f12424838bd08d69915ee86%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C636864716813284651&amp;sdata=qV4EkAL6jHroYEOGlZkv3YLuZelEc6E8osQDa%2FPD18Y%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to