Sure, I will do that.
Thanks!
Yifeng

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:31 PM Gregory Rose <gvrose8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/26/2019 1:18 PM, Yifeng Sun wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > I saw the compilation error for kernel 4.14.111 because `struct_size`
> > isn't defined in kernel source tree. I didn't dig into it though.
>
> I see the problem then.  The .travis.yml file tests 4.14.63.  Please
> update the patch to include an update
> for travis to set the 4.14 kernel being tested to 4.14.111.  That way
> we'll get travis to verify the build as
> well.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Greg
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yifeng
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:13 PM Gregory Rose <gvrose8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/26/2019 11:07 AM, Yifeng Sun wrote:
> >>> CC: Greg Rose <gvrose8...@gmail.com>
> >>> Fixes: f72469405eec9 ("datapath: meter: Use struct_size() in kzalloc()")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Sun <pkusunyif...@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    acinclude.m4                                   | 2 ++
> >>>    datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/overflow.h | 2 +-
> >>>    datapath/meter.c                               | 1 +
> >>>    3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
> >>> index 1607d5f4b1d9..548cbe9ef100 100644
> >>> --- a/acinclude.m4
> >>> +++ b/acinclude.m4
> >>> @@ -920,6 +920,8 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_LINUX_COMPAT], [
> >>>                            [OVS_DEFINE([HAVE_INET_FRAGS_RND])])
> >>>      OVS_GREP_IFELSE([$KSRC/include/linux/overflow.h], 
> >>> [__LINUX_OVERFLOW_H],
> >>>                      [OVS_DEFINE([HAVE_OVERFLOW_H])])
> >>> +  OVS_GREP_IFELSE([$KSRC/include/linux/overflow.h], [struct_size],
> >>> +                  [OVS_DEFINE([HAVE_STRUCT_SIZE])])
> >>>      OVS_GREP_IFELSE([$KSRC/include/linux/mm.h], [kvmalloc_array],
> >>>                      [OVS_DEFINE([HAVE_KVMALLOC_ARRAY])])
> >>>      OVS_GREP_IFELSE([$KSRC/include/linux/mm.h], [kvmalloc_node],
> >>> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/overflow.h 
> >>> b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/overflow.h
> >>> index ff84356db16c..8f1b5b005491 100644
> >>> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/overflow.h
> >>> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/overflow.h
> >>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >>>    /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT */
> >>> -#ifdef HAVE_OVERFLOW_H
> >>> +#if defined(HAVE_OVERFLOW_H) && defined(HAVE_STRUCT_SIZE)
> >>>    #include_next <linux/overflow.h>
> >>>    #else
> >>>    #ifndef __LINUX_OVERFLOW_H
> >>> diff --git a/datapath/meter.c b/datapath/meter.c
> >>> index 51ec1495033a..eda14682fb96 100644
> >>> --- a/datapath/meter.c
> >>> +++ b/datapath/meter.c
> >>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >>>    #include <linux/ip.h>
> >>>    #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>>    #include <linux/openvswitch.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> >>>    #include <linux/netlink.h>
> >>>    #include <linux/rculist.h>
> >>>
> >> Thanks for the patch Yifeng, it looks good but I'm curious because when
> >> I posted the original patch for this it was passing travis build
> >> checks.  Or I thought so at the time.  It bugs me if I missed something.
> >>
> >> In any case I'll give it a quick check and regression test.
> >>
> >> - Greg
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to