> > I've been taking a look at this patch for the last few minutes. It > introduces a lot > of mechanism for the use case. Did you consider any simpler mechanisms to > achieve the same effect? What prevented them from working? > I agree Ben. This change does bring some complexity to the code. A simpler solution would be to leave the ofport number in ovsdb record of the interface (instead of setting it to -1). But issue was when the port delete happens we do not see this record to be able to free the ofport number. Is there a way to handle this?
Warm Regards, Vishal Ajmera _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
