On 7/5/2019 9:08 AM, Taehee Yoo wrote:
When a vport is deleted, the maximum headroom size would be changed.
If the vport which has the largest headroom is deleted,
the new max_headroom would be set.
But, if the new headroom size is equal to the old headroom size,
updating routine is unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420...@gmail.com>
---
  net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
index 33b388103741..892287d06c17 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
@@ -1958,10 +1958,9 @@ static struct vport *lookup_vport(struct net *net,
} -/* Called with ovs_mutex */
-static void update_headroom(struct datapath *dp)
+static unsigned int ovs_get_max_headroom(struct datapath *dp)
  {
-       unsigned dev_headroom, max_headroom = 0;
+       unsigned int dev_headroom, max_headroom = 0;
        struct net_device *dev;
        struct vport *vport;
        int i;
@@ -1975,10 +1974,19 @@ static void update_headroom(struct datapath *dp)
                }
        }
- dp->max_headroom = max_headroom;
+       return max_headroom;
+}
+
+/* Called with ovs_mutex */
+static void ovs_update_headroom(struct datapath *dp, unsigned int new_headroom)
+{
+       struct vport *vport;
+       int i;
+
+       dp->max_headroom = new_headroom;
        for (i = 0; i < DP_VPORT_HASH_BUCKETS; i++)
                hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(vport, &dp->ports[i], dp_hash_node)
-                       netdev_set_rx_headroom(vport->dev, max_headroom);
+                       netdev_set_rx_headroom(vport->dev, new_headroom);
  }
static int ovs_vport_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
@@ -1989,6 +1997,7 @@ static int ovs_vport_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
genl_info *info)
        struct sk_buff *reply;
        struct vport *vport;
        struct datapath *dp;
+       unsigned int new_headroom;
        u32 port_no;
        int err;
@@ -2050,8 +2059,10 @@ static int ovs_vport_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
                                      info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, 0,
                                      OVS_VPORT_CMD_NEW);
- if (netdev_get_fwd_headroom(vport->dev) > dp->max_headroom)
-               update_headroom(dp);
+       new_headroom = netdev_get_fwd_headroom(vport->dev);
+
+       if (new_headroom > dp->max_headroom)
+               ovs_update_headroom(dp, new_headroom);
        else
                netdev_set_rx_headroom(vport->dev, dp->max_headroom);
@@ -2122,11 +2133,12 @@ static int ovs_vport_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) static int ovs_vport_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
  {
-       bool must_update_headroom = false;
+       bool update_headroom = false;
        struct nlattr **a = info->attrs;
        struct sk_buff *reply;
        struct datapath *dp;
        struct vport *vport;
+       unsigned int new_headroom;
        int err;
reply = ovs_vport_cmd_alloc_info();
@@ -2152,12 +2164,17 @@ static int ovs_vport_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, 
struct genl_info *info)
        /* the vport deletion may trigger dp headroom update */
        dp = vport->dp;
        if (netdev_get_fwd_headroom(vport->dev) == dp->max_headroom)
-               must_update_headroom = true;
+               update_headroom = true;
+
        netdev_reset_rx_headroom(vport->dev);
        ovs_dp_detach_port(vport);
- if (must_update_headroom)
-               update_headroom(dp);
+       if (update_headroom) {
+               new_headroom = ovs_get_max_headroom(dp);
+
+               if (new_headroom < dp->max_headroom)
+                       ovs_update_headroom(dp, new_headroom);
+       }
        ovs_unlock();
ovs_notify(&dp_vport_genl_family, reply, info);

I did a compile test and ran the OVS kernel self-test suite.  Looks OK to me.
Tested-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8...@gmail.com>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to