On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:51 AM Numan Siddique <num...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019, 8:14 PM Han Zhou <hz...@ovn.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:05 AM Numan Siddique <num...@ovn.org> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:28 PM Han Zhou <hz...@ovn.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:25 AM Numan Siddique <num...@ovn.org> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 6:23 AM Han Zhou <hz...@ovn.org> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > The series supports interconnecting multiple OVN deployments (e.g. >> > > located at >> > > > > multiple data centers) through logical routers connected with tansit >> > > logical >> > > > > switches with overlay tunnels, managed through OVN control plane. >> > See >> > > the >> > > > > ovn-architecture.rst document updates for more details, and find the >> > > > > instructions in Documentation/tutorials/ovn-interconnection.rst. >> > > > > >> > > > > The first 6 patches are not directly related to the feature, but are >> > > fixes for >> > > > > existing problems but required by later patches. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > For the first 5 patches in the series - Acked-by: Numan Siddique >> > > > <num...@ovn.org> >> > > > >> > > >> > > Thanks Numan. I applied the first 5 patches to master. >> > > >> > > > I think these 5 patches can be merged so that the v2 of this series >> > > > will have lesser patches. >> > > > >> > > > Regarding the patch 6, which updates the NEWS, does it makes sense to >> > > > delete the contents >> > > > of this file and start fresh capturing only OVN related news ? Or >> > > > it's still better to preserve >> > > > the contents ? >> > > > >> > > >> > > Do you mean removing all previous news, or just removing the OVS related >> > > news and keep OVN related news? >> > > >> > > I am ok with removing all the previous news and replace with a pointer to >> > > OVS repo if people want to look at previous OVN news. >> > > >> > > However, I think it may be more straightforward to leave as is for >> > whatever >> > > is there up to 2.12, which clearly tells how OVN is forked from the OVS >> > > project. What do you think? >> > >> > Ok. I think this makes more sense. Let's keep it AS IS. >> > >> > Thanks >> > Numan >> > >> >> Thanks Numan. So can I consider this as acked for patch 6, so that I can >> merge it and send v2 for the rest of the patches. > > > Sure. > Acked-by: Numan Siddique <num...@ovn.org> > for patch 6 > > Numan > Thanks. I applied patch 6 to master after rebase. I sent v2 for the rest of the series at: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=139731
Thanks, Han _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
