The act_ct TC module shares a common conntrack and NAT infrastructure
exposed via netfilter.  It's possible that a packet needs both SNAT and
DNAT manipulation, due to e.g. tuple collision.  Netfilter can support
this because it runs through the NAT table twice - once on ingress and
again after egress.  The act_ct action doesn't have such capability.

Like netfilter hook infrastructure, we should run through NAT twice to
keep the symmetry.

Fixes: b57dc7c13ea9 ("net/sched: Introduce action ct")

Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
---
 net/sched/act_ct.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
index fcc46025e790..f3232a00970f 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
                          bool commit)
 {
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
+       int err;
        enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
 
        if (!(ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT))
@@ -359,7 +360,17 @@ static int tcf_ct_act_nat(struct sk_buff *skb,
                return NF_ACCEPT;
        }
 
-       return ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
+       err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
+       if (err == NF_ACCEPT &&
+           ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT && ct->status & IPS_DST_NAT) {
+               if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
+                       maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_DST;
+               else
+                       maniptype = NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC;
+
+               err = ct_nat_execute(skb, ct, ctinfo, range, maniptype);
+       }
+       return err;
 #else
        return NF_ACCEPT;
 #endif
-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to