Hi Matteo,
Thanks for the patch. But I fail to understand why there is a memory leak.
In fact when I tested in my setup, the test ran without any leak.
The functions dp_execute_lb_output_action and dp_execute_output_action, both
return 'false' if current batch is non-empty.
case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_LB_OUTPUT:
if (dp_execute_lb_output_action(pmd, packets_, should_steal,
nl_attr_get_u32(a))) {
return;
} else {
COVERAGE_ADD(datapath_drop_invalid_port,
dp_packet_batch_size(packets_));
}
break;
And the caller to the function i.e. dp_execute_cb() will then execute
dp_packet_delete_batch(packets_, should_steal); which is last line of this
function.
case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_DROP:
case __OVS_ACTION_ATTR_MAX:
OVS_NOT_REACHED();
}
dp_packet_delete_batch(packets_, should_steal);
If the should_steal is correctly set to true (for e.g. in case this is the
last action), then packet buffer will be freed. Am I missing something here?
Warm Regards,
Vishal Ajmera
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
