Hi Ben, If my understanding is correct, the writer could not be a rcu thread because it does not need report holding or not holding pointers. So old memory will be freed after all rcu thread report quiesce.
Best Regards, Wei Yanqin > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 1:28 AM > To: Linhaifeng <haifeng....@huawei.com> > Cc: Yanqin Wei <yanqin....@arm.com>; d...@openvswitch.org; nd > <n...@arm.com>; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lili...@huawei.com>; chenchanghu > <chenchan...@huawei.com>; Lichunhe <lichu...@huawei.com> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovs rcu: update rcu pointer first > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 07:27:59AM +0000, Linhaifeng wrote: > > We should update rcu pointer first then use ovsrcu_postpone to free > > otherwise maybe cause use-after-free. > > e.g.,reader indicates momentary quiescent and access old pointer after > > writer postpone free old pointer and before setting new pointer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng....@huawei.com> > > I don't see how that's possible, since the writer hasn't quiesced. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev