Hi Ben,

If my understanding is correct, the writer could not be a rcu thread because it 
does not need report holding or not holding pointers.
So old memory will be freed after all rcu thread report quiesce.

Best Regards,
Wei Yanqin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 1:28 AM
> To: Linhaifeng <haifeng....@huawei.com>
> Cc: Yanqin Wei <yanqin....@arm.com>; d...@openvswitch.org; nd
> <n...@arm.com>; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lili...@huawei.com>; chenchanghu
> <chenchan...@huawei.com>; Lichunhe <lichu...@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovs rcu: update rcu pointer first
> 
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 07:27:59AM +0000, Linhaifeng wrote:
> > We should update rcu pointer first then use ovsrcu_postpone to free
> > otherwise maybe cause use-after-free.
> > e.g.,reader indicates momentary quiescent and access old pointer after
> > writer postpone free old pointer and before setting new pointer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linhaifeng <haifeng....@huawei.com>
> 
> I don't see how that's possible, since the writer hasn't quiesced.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to