On 04/06/2020 21:47, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 08:21:49AM +0100, anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com wrote:
From: Anton Ivanov <anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com>
A ByteQ with unlocked head and tail is unsafe for simultaneous
consume/produce.
It isn't meant for that use, or at least it wasn't. If you're changing
the goal then you should document the new guarantees, as do the other
OVS data structures that have thread-safety guarantees.
Ack. I will do in the next patch revision.
It is guaranteed for parallel use by ONE producer and ONE consumer. More
than one on either side will not work.
--
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
https://www.cambridgegreys.com/
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
