On 7/7/20 12:55 AM, Han Zhou wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:33 AM Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com > <mailto:dce...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> Most ARP/NS responder flows can be configured per datapath instead of per >> router port. >> >> The only exception is with distributed gateway router ports which need >> special treatment. This patch changes the ARP/NS responder behavior > and adds: >> - Priority 92 flows to reply to ARP requests on distributed gateway router >> ports, on the chassis where the DNAT entry is bound. >> - Priority 91 flows to drop ARP requests on distributed gateway router > ports, >> on chassis where the DNAT entry is not bound. >> - Priority 90 flows to reply to ARP requests on all other router > ports. This >> last type of flows is programmed exactly once per logical router > limiting >> the total number of required logical flows. >> >> Suggested-by: Han Zhou <hz...@ovn.org <mailto:hz...@ovn.org>> >> Reported-by: Girish Moodalbail <gmoodalb...@gmail.com > <mailto:gmoodalb...@gmail.com>> >> Reported-at: > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2020-June/050186.html >> Acked-by: Numan Siddique <num...@ovn.org <mailto:num...@ovn.org>> >> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com > <mailto:dce...@redhat.com>> >> > I applied this to master. Thanks!
Thanks! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
