On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:51 AM Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:35:01PM -0500, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > It's a legal setup where tunnel ports with the same config are created > > on different bridges served by Open vSwitch. Specifically, multiple > > OVN controllers may emulate multiple chassis running on the same > > physical host, in which case they may need to create separate tunnel > > ports to connect to the same remote chassis on their respective > > bridges. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> > > That makes sense for sending packets, but which one is supposed to > receive a packet when one arrives for that tunnel? >
If we are talking in OVN context, each virtual ovn-controller chassis on the same host has to have a different IP / port to distinguish between chassis. I don't think it's a useful configuration to have two two incoming tunnel ports with the same config for the same IP that are not served by separate DST IP addresses. Ihar _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
