On 12/4/20 3:54 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> Commit 17f22fe46142 tried to address this but only covered some of the
> cases.
> 
> The correct way to report the expected seqno is to take into account if
> there already is a condition change that was requested to the server but
> not acked yet.  In that case, the new condition change request will be
> sent only after the already requested one is acked.  That is, expected
> condition seqno when conditions are up to date is db->cond_seqno + 2 in
> this case.
> 
> Fixes: 17f22fe46142 ("ovsdb-idl: Return correct seqno from 
> ovsdb_idl_db_set_condition().")
> Suggested-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@ovn.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>
> ---

Thanks!

Applied to master and backported down to 2.12.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to