Hi Joe,

Maybe you can take a look...
Thanks,
fbl

On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 11:40:12AM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> 
> Hi Pravin,
> 
> Any thoughts on this patch? We are closing OVS 2.16, so it would
> be nice to know if it looks okay or needs changes, specially
> changes related to the userspace interface.
> 
> Thanks,
> fbl
> 
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:53:49AM -0400, Mark Gray wrote:
> > The Open vSwitch kernel module uses the upcall mechanism to send
> > packets from kernel space to user space when it misses in the kernel
> > space flow table. The upcall sends packets via a Netlink socket.
> > Currently, a Netlink socket is created for every vport. In this way,
> > there is a 1:1 mapping between a vport and a Netlink socket.
> > When a packet is received by a vport, if it needs to be sent to
> > user space, it is sent via the corresponding Netlink socket.
> > 
> > This mechanism, with various iterations of the corresponding user
> > space code, has seen some limitations and issues:
> > 
> > * On systems with a large number of vports, there is a correspondingly
> > large number of Netlink sockets which can limit scaling.
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526306)
> > * Packet reordering on upcalls.
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844576)
> > * A thundering herd issue.
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834444)
> > 
> > This patch introduces an alternative, feature-negotiated, upcall
> > mode using a per-cpu dispatch rather than a per-vport dispatch.
> > 
> > In this mode, the Netlink socket to be used for the upcall is
> > selected based on the CPU of the thread that is executing the upcall.
> > In this way, it resolves the issues above as:
> > 
> > a) The number of Netlink sockets scales with the number of CPUs
> > rather than the number of vports.
> > b) Ordering per-flow is maintained as packets are distributed to
> > CPUs based on mechanisms such as RSS and flows are distributed
> > to a single user space thread.
> > c) Packets from a flow can only wake up one user space thread.
> > 
> > The corresponding user space code can be found at:
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2021-April/382618.html
> > 
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1844576
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Gray <mark.d.g...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     v1 - Reworked based on Flavio's comments:
> >          * Fixed handling of userspace action case
> >          * Renamed 'struct dp_portids'
> >          * Fixed handling of return from kmalloc()
> >          * Removed check for dispatch type from ovs_dp_get_upcall_portid()
> >        - Reworked based on Dan's comments:
> >          * Fixed handling of return from kmalloc()
> >        - Reworked based on Pravin's comments:
> >          * Fixed handling of userspace action case
> >        - Added kfree() in destroy_dp_rcu() to cleanup netlink port ids
> > 
> >  include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h |  8 ++++
> >  net/openvswitch/actions.c        |  6 ++-
> >  net/openvswitch/datapath.c       | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  net/openvswitch/datapath.h       | 20 +++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h 
> > b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > index 8d16744edc31..6571b57b2268 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ enum ovs_datapath_cmd {
> >   * set on the datapath port (for OVS_ACTION_ATTR_MISS).  Only valid on
> >   * %OVS_DP_CMD_NEW requests. A value of zero indicates that upcalls should
> >   * not be sent.
> > + * OVS_DP_ATTR_PER_CPU_PIDS: Per-cpu array of PIDs for upcalls when
> > + * OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU feature is set.
> >   * @OVS_DP_ATTR_STATS: Statistics about packets that have passed through 
> > the
> >   * datapath.  Always present in notifications.
> >   * @OVS_DP_ATTR_MEGAFLOW_STATS: Statistics about mega flow masks usage for 
> > the
> > @@ -87,6 +89,9 @@ enum ovs_datapath_attr {
> >     OVS_DP_ATTR_USER_FEATURES,      /* OVS_DP_F_*  */
> >     OVS_DP_ATTR_PAD,
> >     OVS_DP_ATTR_MASKS_CACHE_SIZE,
> > +   OVS_DP_ATTR_PER_CPU_PIDS,   /* Netlink PIDS to receive upcalls in 
> > per-cpu
> > +                                * dispatch mode
> > +                                */
> >     __OVS_DP_ATTR_MAX
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -127,6 +132,9 @@ struct ovs_vport_stats {
> >  /* Allow tc offload recirc sharing */
> >  #define OVS_DP_F_TC_RECIRC_SHARING (1 << 2)
> >  
> > +/* Allow per-cpu dispatch of upcalls */
> > +#define OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU   (1 << 3)
> > +
> >  /* Fixed logical ports. */
> >  #define OVSP_LOCAL      ((__u32)0)
> >  
> > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/actions.c b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
> > index ef15d9eb4774..f79679746c62 100644
> > --- a/net/openvswitch/actions.c
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/actions.c
> > @@ -924,7 +924,11 @@ static int output_userspace(struct datapath *dp, 
> > struct sk_buff *skb,
> >                     break;
> >  
> >             case OVS_USERSPACE_ATTR_PID:
> > -                   upcall.portid = nla_get_u32(a);
> > +                   if (dp->user_features & 
> > OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU)
> > +                           upcall.portid =
> > +                              ovs_dp_get_upcall_portid(dp, 
> > smp_processor_id());
> > +                   else
> > +                           upcall.portid = nla_get_u32(a);
> >                     break;
> >  
> >             case OVS_USERSPACE_ATTR_EGRESS_TUN_PORT: {
> > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> > index bc164b35e67d..8d54fa323543 100644
> > --- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static void destroy_dp_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> >     free_percpu(dp->stats_percpu);
> >     kfree(dp->ports);
> >     ovs_meters_exit(dp);
> > +   kfree(dp->upcall_portids);
> >     kfree(dp);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -239,7 +240,12 @@ void ovs_dp_process_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> > sw_flow_key *key)
> >  
> >             memset(&upcall, 0, sizeof(upcall));
> >             upcall.cmd = OVS_PACKET_CMD_MISS;
> > -           upcall.portid = ovs_vport_find_upcall_portid(p, skb);
> > +
> > +           if (dp->user_features & OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU)
> > +                   upcall.portid = ovs_dp_get_upcall_portid(dp, 
> > smp_processor_id());
> > +           else
> > +                   upcall.portid = ovs_vport_find_upcall_portid(p, skb);
> > +
> >             upcall.mru = OVS_CB(skb)->mru;
> >             error = ovs_dp_upcall(dp, skb, key, &upcall, 0);
> >             if (unlikely(error))
> > @@ -1594,16 +1600,67 @@ static void ovs_dp_reset_user_features(struct 
> > sk_buff *skb,
> >  
> >  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(tc_recirc_sharing_support);
> >  
> > +int ovs_dp_set_upcall_portids(struct datapath *dp,
> > +                         const struct nlattr *ids)
> > +{
> > +   struct dp_nlsk_pids *old, *dp_nlsk_pids;
> > +
> > +   if (!nla_len(ids) || nla_len(ids) % sizeof(u32))
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +   old = ovsl_dereference(dp->upcall_portids);
> > +
> > +   dp_nlsk_pids = kmalloc(sizeof(*dp_nlsk_pids) + nla_len(ids),
> > +                          GFP_KERNEL);
> > +   if (!dp_nlsk_pids)
> > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +   dp_nlsk_pids->n_pids = nla_len(ids) / sizeof(u32);
> > +   nla_memcpy(dp_nlsk_pids->pids, ids, nla_len(ids));
> > +
> > +   rcu_assign_pointer(dp->upcall_portids, dp_nlsk_pids);
> > +
> > +   kfree_rcu(old, rcu);
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +u32 ovs_dp_get_upcall_portid(const struct datapath *dp, uint32_t cpu_id)
> > +{
> > +   struct dp_nlsk_pids *dp_nlsk_pids;
> > +
> > +   dp_nlsk_pids = rcu_dereference_ovsl(dp->upcall_portids);
> > +
> > +   if (dp_nlsk_pids) {
> > +           if (cpu_id < dp_nlsk_pids->n_pids) {
> > +                   return dp_nlsk_pids->pids[cpu_id];
> > +           } else if (dp_nlsk_pids->n_pids > 0 && cpu_id >= 
> > dp_nlsk_pids->n_pids) {
> > +                   /* If the number of netlink PIDs is mismatched with the 
> > number of
> > +                    * CPUs as seen by the kernel, log this and send the 
> > upcall to an
> > +                    * arbitrary socket (0) in order to not drop packets
> > +                    */
> > +                   pr_info_ratelimited("cpu_id mismatch with handler 
> > threads");
> > +                   return dp_nlsk_pids->pids[cpu_id % 
> > dp_nlsk_pids->n_pids];
> > +           } else {
> > +                   return 0;
> > +           }
> > +   } else {
> > +           return 0;
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int ovs_dp_change(struct datapath *dp, struct nlattr *a[])
> >  {
> >     u32 user_features = 0;
> > +   int err;
> >  
> >     if (a[OVS_DP_ATTR_USER_FEATURES]) {
> >             user_features = nla_get_u32(a[OVS_DP_ATTR_USER_FEATURES]);
> >  
> >             if (user_features & ~(OVS_DP_F_VPORT_PIDS |
> >                                   OVS_DP_F_UNALIGNED |
> > -                                 OVS_DP_F_TC_RECIRC_SHARING))
> > +                                 OVS_DP_F_TC_RECIRC_SHARING |
> > +                                 OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU))
> >                     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  
> >  #if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT)
> > @@ -1624,6 +1681,15 @@ static int ovs_dp_change(struct datapath *dp, struct 
> > nlattr *a[])
> >  
> >     dp->user_features = user_features;
> >  
> > +   if (dp->user_features & OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU &&
> > +       a[OVS_DP_ATTR_PER_CPU_PIDS]) {
> > +           /* Upcall Netlink Port IDs have been updated */
> > +           err = ovs_dp_set_upcall_portids(dp,
> > +                                           a[OVS_DP_ATTR_PER_CPU_PIDS]);
> > +           if (err)
> > +                   return err;
> > +   }
> > +
> >     if (dp->user_features & OVS_DP_F_TC_RECIRC_SHARING)
> >             static_branch_enable(&tc_recirc_sharing_support);
> >     else
> > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
> > index 38f7d3e66ca6..a12a7d0168b1 100644
> > --- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
> > @@ -50,6 +50,21 @@ struct dp_stats_percpu {
> >     struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
> >  };
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * struct dp_nlsk_pids - array of netlink portids of for a datapath.
> > + *                       This is used when OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU
> > + *                       is enabled and must be protected by rcu.
> > + * @rcu: RCU callback head for deferred destruction.
> > + * @n_pids: Size of @pids array.
> > + * @pids: Array storing the Netlink socket PIDs indexed by CPU ID for 
> > packets
> > + *       that miss the flow table.
> > + */
> > +struct dp_nlsk_pids {
> > +   struct rcu_head rcu;
> > +   u32 n_pids;
> > +   u32 pids[];
> > +};
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * struct datapath - datapath for flow-based packet switching
> >   * @rcu: RCU callback head for deferred destruction.
> > @@ -61,6 +76,7 @@ struct dp_stats_percpu {
> >   * @net: Reference to net namespace.
> >   * @max_headroom: the maximum headroom of all vports in this datapath; it 
> > will
> >   * be used by all the internal vports in this dp.
> > + * @upcall_portids: RCU protected 'struct dp_nlsk_pids'.
> >   *
> >   * Context: See the comment on locking at the top of datapath.c for 
> > additional
> >   * locking information.
> > @@ -87,6 +103,8 @@ struct datapath {
> >  
> >     /* Switch meters. */
> >     struct dp_meter_table meter_tbl;
> > +
> > +   struct dp_nlsk_pids __rcu *upcall_portids;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -243,6 +261,8 @@ int ovs_dp_upcall(struct datapath *, struct sk_buff *,
> >               const struct sw_flow_key *, const struct dp_upcall_info *,
> >               uint32_t cutlen);
> >  
> > +u32 ovs_dp_get_upcall_portid(const struct datapath *dp, uint32_t cpu_id);
> > +int ovs_dp_set_upcall_portids(struct datapath *dp, const struct nlattr 
> > *ids);
> >  const char *ovs_dp_name(const struct datapath *dp);
> >  struct sk_buff *ovs_vport_cmd_build_info(struct vport *vport, struct net 
> > *net,
> >                                      u32 portid, u32 seq, u8 cmd);
> > -- 
> > 2.27.0
> > 
> 
> -- 
> fbl
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

-- 
fbl
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to