On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 3:58 AM Vladislav Odintsov <odiv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01.12.2021 15:56, Vladislav Odintsov wrote: > > Currently if user has a stateless and statetul ACLs (allow-stateless and > > allow-related) in one port group or in one logical switch simultaneously, > > the stateless rules whould take precedence. > > This patch series adds support for mixing all the ACLs types with the > > respect to their priority. > > This change requires next: > > > > Also, as an optimisation, traffic from HW VTEP switch in ingress datapath > > is passed from ls_in_l2_sec directly to ls_in_l2_lkup, as it doesn't need > > any processing in ingress pipeline except determining outport in > > ls_in_l2_lkup table. > > > > Vladislav Odintsov (3): > > Revert "northd: support HW VTEP with stateful datapath" > > northd: send ingress packets from HW VTEP directly to L2_LKUP table > > northd: support mix of stateless ACL with lower priority than stateful > > > > northd/northd.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > northd/ovn-northd.8.xml | 35 ++++--------- > > northd/ovn_northd.dl | 47 +++++------------ > > tests/ovn-northd.at | 50 ++++++++++-------- > > 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) > > > Hi Numan, > > is is possible to plan this series to be included in 21.12?
Hi Vladislav, I was thinking of considering them after branching. Do you need these patches for 21.12 ? I'm trying to understand the risk factor ? Are these patches risky at this time or will not affect other users who don't use this scenario ? If it is risk free, +1 from me for 21.12. Thanks Numan > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > d...@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
