On Sat, 11 Dec 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:57:33 +0200 Paul Blakey wrote:
> > @@ -238,10 +239,12 @@ void
> > skb_flow_dissect_ct(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct flow_dissector *flow_dissector,
> > void *target_container, u16 *ctinfo_map,
> > - size_t mapsize, bool post_ct)
> > + size_t mapsize)
> > {
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK)
> > + bool post_ct = tc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct;
> > struct flow_dissector_key_ct *key;
> > + u16 zone = tc_skb_cb(skb)->zone;
> > enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
> > struct nf_conn_labels *cl;
> > struct nf_conn *ct;
> > @@ -260,6 +263,7 @@ skb_flow_dissect_ct(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > if (!ct) {
> > key->ct_state = TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_TRACKED |
> > TCA_FLOWER_KEY_CT_FLAGS_INVALID;
> > + key->ct_zone = zone;
> > return;
> > }
> >
>
> Why is flow dissector expecting skb cb to be TC now?
> Please keep the appropriate abstractions intact.
>
Will do. Sending v3.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
