On 3/16/22 15:08, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > > On 14 Jul 2021, at 14:33, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > >> On 8 Jul 2021, at 21:21, Ilya Maximets wrote: >> >>> On 5/24/21 2:39 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote: >>>> On Tue, 18 May 2021 06:17:48 -0400 >>>> Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Due to flow lookup optimizations, especially in the resubmit/clone cases, >>>>> we might end up with multiple ct_clear actions, which are not necessary. >>>>> >>>>> This patch only adds the ct_clear action to the datapath if any ct state >>>>> is tracked. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> v2: Insert ct_clear only when ct information is tracked vs tracking >>>>> successive >>>>> ct_clear actions. >>>>> >>>>> ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 4 +++- >>>>> tests/ofproto-dpif.at | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> >>>> Acked-By: Timothy Redaelli <tredae...@redhat.com> >>>> >>> >>> Thanks! Applied. >> >> Can this also be backported to the stable releases? > > Guess this email might have gone missing. Can we still get this backported to > make hw offload work better?
Oops. Backported down to 2.13 now. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
