On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 9:50 AM Numan Siddique <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:26 PM Numan Siddique <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 12:21 PM Numan Siddique <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 8:01 PM Han Zhou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Add a new action ct_lb_mark, which is the same as ct_lb except that it > > > > internally uses ct_mark to store the NAT flag, while ct_lb uses ct_label > > > > for the same purpose. This will be used later to move the masked access > > > > of ct_label to ct_mark while keeping the backward compatibility. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Han Zhou <[email protected]> > > > > > > Acked-by: Numan Siddique <[email protected]> > > > > Looks like there is a system test failure in the CI run. Can you > > please check if its because of this patch or its a flaky one. > > > > > > 97: Load balancer health checks -- ovn-northd -- dp-groups=yes FAILED > > (ovs-macros.at:255) > > 98: Load balancer health checks -- ovn-northd -- dp-groups=no FAILED > > (ovs-macros.at:255) > > This test case fails for me locally too with just the first 2 patches applied. > > The failure is not seen when all the patches are applied. > Thanks Numan. Sorry for my mistake. When fixing the system test failures I misplaced the fix in patch 2 while they should belong to patch 5. Fixed in v3.
Thanks, Han _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
