On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 10:27:15 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: > Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 06:39:55AM CEST, k...@kernel.org wrote: > >Netdev reference helpers have a dev_ prefix for historic > >reasons. Renaming the old helpers would be too much churn > > Hmm, I think it would be great to eventually rename the rest too in > order to maintain unique prefix for netdev things. Why do you think the > "churn" would be an issue?
Felt like we're better of moving everyone to the new tracking helpers than doing just a pure rename. But I'm not opposed to a pure rename. > >diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c > >index 817577e713d7..815738c0e067 100644 > >--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c > >+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c > >@@ -3462,7 +3462,7 @@ static int macsec_dev_init(struct net_device *dev) > > memcpy(dev->broadcast, real_dev->broadcast, dev->addr_len); > > > > /* Get macsec's reference to real_dev */ > >- dev_hold_track(real_dev, &macsec->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); > >+ netdev_hold(real_dev, &macsec->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); > > So we later decide to rename dev_hold() to obey the netdev_*() naming > scheme, we would have collision. dev_hold() should not be used in new code, we should use tracking everywhere. Given that we can name the old helpers __netdev_hold(). > Also, seems to me odd to have: > OLDPREFIX_x() > and > NEWPREFIX_x() > to be different functions. > > For the sake of not making naming mess, could we rather have: > netdev_hold_track() > or > netdev_hold_tr() if the prior is too long > ? See above, one day non-track version should be removed. IMO to encourage use of the track-capable API we could keep their names short and call the legacy functions __netdev_hold() as I mentioned or maybe netdev_hold_notrack(). _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
