[ original commit fe171e4f109f001f07b867756a261d898f0d2cfc ]

As described in the bugzilla below, cpu_has_isa code may be compiled
with some AVX512 instructions in it, because cpu.c is built as part of
the libopenvswitchavx512.
This is a problem when this function (supposed to probe for AVX512
instructions availability) is invoked from generic OVS code, on older
CPUs that don't support them.

For the same reason, dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe,
dp_netdev_input_outer_avx512_probe, mfex_avx512_probe and
mfex_avx512_vbmi_probe are potential runtime bombs and can't either be
built as part of libopenvswitchavx512.

Move cpu.c to be part of the "normal" libopenvswitch.
And move other helpers in generic OVS code.

Note:
- dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe is split in two, because it also
  needs to do its own magic,
- while moving those helpers, prefer direct calls to cpu_has_isa and
  avoid cast to intermediate integer variables when a simple boolean
  is enough,

Fixes: 352b6c7116cd ("dpif-lookup: add avx512 gather implementation.")
Fixes: abb807e27dd4 ("dpif-netdev: Add command to switch dpif implementation.")
Fixes: 250ceddcc2d0 ("dpif-netdev/mfex: Add AVX512 based optimized miniflow 
extract")
Fixes: b366fa2f4947 ("dpif-netdev: Call cpuid for x86 isa availability.")
Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2100393
Reported-by: Ales Musil <amu...@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ales Musil <amu...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ales Musil <amu...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
---
 lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c |  8 +-------
 lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.c               | 13 +++++++++++++
 lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.h               |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c 
b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c
index 5e3634249d..55fcc327b0 100644
--- a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c
+++ b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup-avx512-gather.c
@@ -237,16 +237,10 @@ dpcls_avx512_gather_mf_any(struct dpcls_subtable 
*subtable, uint32_t keys_map,
 }
 
 dpcls_subtable_lookup_func
-dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe(uint32_t u0_bits, uint32_t u1_bits)
+dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe__(uint32_t u0_bits, uint32_t u1_bits)
 {
     dpcls_subtable_lookup_func f = NULL;
 
-    int avx512f_available = dpdk_get_cpu_has_isa("x86_64", "avx512f");
-    int bmi2_available = dpdk_get_cpu_has_isa("x86_64", "bmi2");
-    if (!avx512f_available || !bmi2_available) {
-        return NULL;
-    }
-
     CHECK_LOOKUP_FUNCTION(5, 1);
     CHECK_LOOKUP_FUNCTION(4, 1);
     CHECK_LOOKUP_FUNCTION(4, 0);
diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.c b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.c
index bd0a99abe7..c19ac8dd37 100644
--- a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.c
+++ b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.c
@@ -22,6 +22,19 @@
 
 VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(dpif_netdev_lookup);
 
+#if (__x86_64__ && HAVE_AVX512F && HAVE_LD_AVX512_GOOD && __SSE4_2__)
+static dpcls_subtable_lookup_func
+dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe(uint32_t u0_bits, uint32_t u1_bits)
+{
+    if (!dpdk_get_cpu_has_isa("x86_64", "avx512f")
+        || !dpdk_get_cpu_has_isa("x86_64", "bmi2")) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
+
+    return dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe__(u0_bits, u1_bits);
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Actual list of implementations goes here */
 static struct dpcls_subtable_lookup_info_t subtable_lookups[] = {
     /* The autovalidator implementation will not be used by default, it must
diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.h b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.h
index bd72aa29b8..2c6c6532da 100644
--- a/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.h
+++ b/lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ dpcls_subtable_generic_probe(uint32_t u0_bit_count, uint32_t 
u1_bit_count);
 
 /* Probe function for AVX-512 gather implementation */
 dpcls_subtable_lookup_func
-dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe(uint32_t u0_bit_cnt, uint32_t u1_bit_cnt);
+dpcls_subtable_avx512_gather_probe__(uint32_t u0_bit_cnt, uint32_t u1_bit_cnt);
 
 
 /* Subtable registration and iteration helpers */
-- 
2.36.1

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to