On 9/9/22 13:29, Paolo Valerio wrote:
> Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@ovn.org> writes:
> 
>> On 8/4/22 18:07, Paolo Valerio wrote:
>>> This patch avoids to show flags_orig/flags_reply key if they have no value.
>>> E.g., the following:
>>>
>>> NEW tcp,orig=([...]),reply=([...]),id=1800618864,
>>> status=CONFIRMED|SRC_NAT_DONE|DST_NAT_DONE,timeout=120,
>>> protoinfo=(state_orig=SYN_SENT,state_reply=SYN_SENT,wscale_orig=7,
>>>            wscale_reply=0,flags_orig=WINDOW_SCALE|SACK_PERM,flags_reply=)
>>>
>>> becomes:
>>>
>>> NEW tcp,orig=([...]),reply=([...]),id=1800618864,
>>> status=CONFIRMED|SRC_NAT_DONE|DST_NAT_DONE,timeout=120,
>>> protoinfo=(state_orig=SYN_SENT,state_reply=SYN_SENT,wscale_orig=7,
>>>            wscale_reply=0,flags_orig=WINDOW_SCALE|SACK_PERM)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valerio <pvale...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/ct-dpif.c |   14 ++++++++++----
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/ct-dpif.c b/lib/ct-dpif.c
>>> index cfc2315e3..f1a375523 100644
>>> --- a/lib/ct-dpif.c
>>> +++ b/lib/ct-dpif.c
>>> @@ -512,10 +512,16 @@ ct_dpif_format_protoinfo_tcp_verbose(struct ds *ds,
>>>                        protoinfo->tcp.wscale_orig,
>>>                        protoinfo->tcp.wscale_reply);
>>>      }
>>> -    ct_dpif_format_flags(ds, ",flags_orig=", protoinfo->tcp.flags_orig,
>>> -                         tcp_flags);
>>> -    ct_dpif_format_flags(ds, ",flags_reply=", protoinfo->tcp.flags_reply,
>>> -                         tcp_flags);
>>> +
>>> +    if (protoinfo->tcp.flags_orig) {
>>> +        ct_dpif_format_flags(ds, ",flags_orig=", protoinfo->tcp.flags_orig,
>>> +                             tcp_flags);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (protoinfo->tcp.flags_reply) {
>>> +        ct_dpif_format_flags(ds, ",flags_reply=", 
>>> protoinfo->tcp.flags_reply,
>>> +                             tcp_flags);
>>> +    }
>>
>> Hmm.  I'm trying to understand why ct_dpif_format_flags() exists at all.
>> Shouldn't this be just:
>>
>>   format_flags_masked(ds, "flags_orig", packet_tcp_flag_to_string,
>>                       protoinfo->tcp.flags_orig, TCP_FLAGS(OVS_BE16_MAX),
>>                       TCP_FLAGS(OVS_BE16_MAX));
>>
>> ?
>>
>> This will change the appearance of the flags, so maybe tcp_flags[] array
>> should be replaced with a simple conversion function.
>>
> 
> Uhm, I guess you're right. It seems redundant and could be removed.
> What about something like this?

The code below looks OK at the first glance.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

> 
> diff --git a/lib/ct-dpif.c b/lib/ct-dpif.c
> index cfc2315e3..6f17a26b5 100644
> --- a/lib/ct-dpif.c
> +++ b/lib/ct-dpif.c
> @@ -35,20 +35,11 @@ static void ct_dpif_format_counters(struct ds *,
>                                      const struct ct_dpif_counters *);
>  static void ct_dpif_format_timestamp(struct ds *,
>                                       const struct ct_dpif_timestamp *);
> -static void ct_dpif_format_flags(struct ds *, const char *title,
> -                                 uint32_t flags, const struct flags *);
>  static void ct_dpif_format_protoinfo(struct ds *, const char *title,
>                                       const struct ct_dpif_protoinfo *,
>                                       bool verbose);
>  static void ct_dpif_format_helper(struct ds *, const char *title,
>                                    const struct ct_dpif_helper *);
> -
> -static const struct flags ct_dpif_status_flags[] = {
> -#define CT_DPIF_STATUS_FLAG(FLAG) { CT_DPIF_STATUS_##FLAG, #FLAG },
> -    CT_DPIF_STATUS_FLAGS
> -#undef CT_DPIF_STATUS_FLAG
> -    { 0, NULL } /* End marker. */
> -};
>  
>  /* Dumping */
>  
> @@ -275,6 +266,20 @@ ct_dpif_entry_uninit(struct ct_dpif_entry *entry)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static const char *
> +ct_dpif_status_flags(uint32_t flags)
> +{
> +    switch (flags) {
> +#define CT_DPIF_STATUS_FLAG(FLAG) \
> +    case CT_DPIF_STATUS_##FLAG: \
> +        return #FLAG;
> +    CT_DPIF_STATUS_FLAGS
> +#undef CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAG
> +    default:
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  void
>  ct_dpif_format_entry(const struct ct_dpif_entry *entry, struct ds *ds,
>                       bool verbose, bool print_stats)
> @@ -305,8 +310,9 @@ ct_dpif_format_entry(const struct ct_dpif_entry *entry, 
> struct ds *ds,
>          ds_put_format(ds, ",zone=%"PRIu16, entry->zone);
>      }
>      if (verbose) {
> -        ct_dpif_format_flags(ds, ",status=", entry->status,
> -                             ct_dpif_status_flags);
> +        format_flags_masked(ds, ",status", ct_dpif_status_flags,
> +                            entry->status, CT_DPIF_STATUS_MASK,
> +                            CT_DPIF_STATUS_MASK);
>      }
>      if (print_stats) {
>          ds_put_format(ds, ",timeout=%"PRIu32, entry->timeout);
> @@ -415,28 +421,6 @@ ct_dpif_format_tuple(struct ds *ds, const struct 
> ct_dpif_tuple *tuple)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static void
> -ct_dpif_format_flags(struct ds *ds, const char *title, uint32_t flags,
> -                     const struct flags *table)
> -{
> -    if (title) {
> -        ds_put_cstr(ds, title);
> -    }
> -    for (; table->name; table++) {
> -        if (flags & table->flag) {
> -            ds_put_format(ds, "%s|", table->name);
> -        }
> -    }
> -    ds_chomp(ds, '|');
> -}
> -
> -static const struct flags tcp_flags[] = {
> -#define CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAG(FLAG)  { CT_DPIF_TCPF_##FLAG, #FLAG },
> -    CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAGS
> -#undef CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAG
> -    { 0, NULL } /* End marker. */
> -};
> -
>  const char *ct_dpif_tcp_state_string[] = {
>  #define CT_DPIF_TCP_STATE(STATE) [CT_DPIF_TCPS_##STATE] = #STATE,
>      CT_DPIF_TCP_STATES
> @@ -498,6 +482,20 @@ ct_dpif_format_protoinfo_tcp(struct ds *ds,
>      ct_dpif_format_enum(ds, "state=", tcp_state, ct_dpif_tcp_state_string);
>  }
>  
> +static const char *
> +ct_dpif_tcp_flags(uint32_t flags)
> +{
> +    switch (flags) {
> +#define CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAG(FLAG) \
> +    case CT_DPIF_TCPF_##FLAG: \
> +        return #FLAG;
> +    CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAGS
> +#undef CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAG
> +    default:
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  ct_dpif_format_protoinfo_tcp_verbose(struct ds *ds,
>                                       const struct ct_dpif_protoinfo 
> *protoinfo)
> @@ -512,10 +510,14 @@ ct_dpif_format_protoinfo_tcp_verbose(struct ds *ds,
>                        protoinfo->tcp.wscale_orig,
>                        protoinfo->tcp.wscale_reply);
>      }
> -    ct_dpif_format_flags(ds, ",flags_orig=", protoinfo->tcp.flags_orig,
> -                         tcp_flags);
> -    ct_dpif_format_flags(ds, ",flags_reply=", protoinfo->tcp.flags_reply,
> -                         tcp_flags);
> +
> +    format_flags_masked(ds, ",flags_orig", ct_dpif_tcp_flags,
> +                        protoinfo->tcp.flags_orig, CT_DPIF_TCPF_MASK,
> +                        CT_DPIF_TCPF_MASK);
> +
> +    format_flags_masked(ds, ",flags_reply", ct_dpif_tcp_flags,
> +                        protoinfo->tcp.flags_reply, CT_DPIF_TCPF_MASK,
> +                        CT_DPIF_TCPF_MASK);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> diff --git a/lib/ct-dpif.h b/lib/ct-dpif.h
> index b59cba962..2848549b0 100644
> --- a/lib/ct-dpif.h
> +++ b/lib/ct-dpif.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ enum ct_dpif_tcp_flags {
>  #undef CT_DPIF_TCP_FLAG
>  };
>  
> +#define CT_DPIF_TCPF_MASK ((CT_DPIF_TCPF_MAXACK_SET << 1) - 1)
> +
>  extern const char *ct_dpif_sctp_state_string[];
>  
>  #define CT_DPIF_SCTP_STATES \
> @@ -173,6 +175,8 @@ enum ct_dpif_status_flags {
>  #undef CT_DPIF_STATUS_FLAG
>  };
>  
> +#define CT_DPIF_STATUS_MASK ((CT_DPIF_STATUS_UNTRACKED << 1) - 1)
> +
>  struct ct_dpif_entry {
>      /* Const members. */
>      struct ct_dpif_tuple tuple_orig;
> 
> 
>> In any case the convention seems to be to print a '0' if the field is empty.
>> See the implementation of format_flags() function.  And that seems to make
>> sense in the verbose output.
>>
>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to