Hi Lorenzo, Is load balancer affinity intended to work with
a) Load balancers that do not specify a protocol? b) Load balancers that do not specify a VIP port? c) Load balancers that do not specify a backend port? On 10/4/22 09:02, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
Introduce load-balancer affinity timeout in order to dnat connections received from the same client to a given load-balancer to the same backend if received in the affinity timeslot specified by the CMS. Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127959 Lorenzo Bianconi (3): actions: introduce commit_lb_aff action actions: introduce chk_lb_aff action northd: rely on new actions for lb affinity controller/lflow.h | 1 + include/ovn/actions.h | 16 ++ include/ovn/logical-fields.h | 3 + lib/actions.c | 389 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/lb.c | 3 + lib/lb.h | 1 + northd/northd.c | 185 ++++++++++++++--- northd/ovn-northd.8.xml | 208 ++++++++++++++++--- ovn-sb.xml | 44 ++++ tests/ovn-northd.at | 346 +++++++++++++++++++------------ tests/ovn.at | 65 +++--- tests/system-ovn.at | 182 +++++++++++++++- utilities/ovn-trace.c | 4 + 13 files changed, 1226 insertions(+), 221 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
