On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > > On 26 Jan 2023, at 17:58, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:01:19PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > >> With some datapaths, read TC, it takes a bit longer to update the > >> OpenFlow statistics. Rather than adding an additional delay, try > >> to read the counters multiple times until we get the desired value. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com> > >> Acked-by: Roi Dayan <r...@nvidia.com> > > > > When, possibly unwisely, running this test on my laptop, > > with a somewhat old kernel the tests fail with absurd byte counts. > > I haven't had time to dig into why. > > I noticed this happens sometimes, and I excluded this test from the total set > in the last patch :) > > However, I also fixed some counter issues recently which fixed it in my setup: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/167361458369.1145547.15786262052264455216.stgit@ebuild/ > > Can you try this?
Yes. I made a quick attempt just now and it does change things. n_bytes now seems to be 0 for both cases (closer to but still not 138). Perhaps that is explained by a timing issue. I'll see if I can poke a little more. But likely not today. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
