On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:24:57PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > > On 16 Feb 2023, at 13:21, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > > On 15 Feb 2023, at 21:15, Ilya Maximets wrote: > > > >> On 2/14/23 14:54, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > >>> Run "make check-offloads" as part of the GitHub actions tests. > >>> > >>> This test was run 25 times using GitHub actions, and the > >>> failing rerun test cases where excluded. There are quite some > >>> first-run failures, but unfortunately, there is no other > >>> more stable kernel available as a GitHub-hosted runner. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com> > >>> --- > >> > >> It doesn't seems to take that much time. Maybe it's not that > >> bad of an idea after all. :) > >> > >> It might make sense to run this job with asan/ubsan enabled. > >> What do you think? We might re-structure asan/ubsan jobs to > >> run them at the same time for this, like OVN does. > > > > I think this was giving a lot of errors, but they might all be fixed by > > Mike’s fixes. > > > > I’ll take a look and see what OVN does… > > I did make the change to combine the UBSAN and ASAN tests, but I did not > enable it for this specific test. > > The tests takes too long (more than 30 min, so it’s canceled by GitHub), and > there are some failures. Quickly looking at some it seems timing-related.
FWIIW, OVN seems to take the approach of splitting system tests into three batches: 1-99, 100-199, 200-. Or something like that. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
