On 2/22/23 11:29, Nobuhiro MIKI wrote:
> With this series, the preferred source address in ovs-router is obtained
> from both ovs/route/add command and kernel FIB.
>
> v5:
> - Add patch to fix man page
> v4:
> - Add cleanup patch for ovs/route/add
> - Remove unrelated code
> v3:
> - Fix netdev-dummy to support multiple IP addresses
> - Add validation and unit tests for ovs/route/add
> - Refactor parsing for optional parameters in ovs/route/add command
> v2:
> - Add NEWS
>
> Nobuhiro MIKI (5):
> netdev-dummy: Support multiple IP addresses.
> ovs-router: Cleanup parser for ovs/route/add command.
> ofproto: Fix mam page for tunnel related commands.
> ovs-router: Introduce src option in ovs/route/add command.
> route-table: Retrieving the preferred source address from Netlink.
>
> NEWS | 3 +
> lib/netdev-dummy.c | 67 ++++++++++------
> lib/ovs-router.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> lib/ovs-router.h | 3 +-
> lib/route-table.c | 16 +++-
> ofproto/ofproto-tnl-unixctl.man | 9 ++-
> tests/ovs-router.at | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tests/system-route.at | 39 +++++++++
> 8 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
Hi. Thanks for the patches!
The set looks good to me in general. But I'd like to propose a
couple of minor changes for the patch #1:
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dummy.c b/lib/netdev-dummy.c
index 7d3d2aa23..7467e9fbc 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dummy.c
+++ b/lib/netdev-dummy.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct netdev_dummy {
struct pcap_file *tx_pcap, *rxq_pcap OVS_GUARDED;
- struct ovs_list addrs;
+ struct ovs_list addrs OVS_GUARDED;
struct ovs_list rxes OVS_GUARDED; /* List of child "netdev_rxq_dummy"s. */
struct hmap offloaded_flows OVS_GUARDED;
@@ -814,10 +814,8 @@ netdev_dummy_get_addr_list(const struct netdev *netdev_,
struct in6_addr **paddr
struct netdev_addr_dummy *addr_dummy;
ovs_mutex_lock(&netdev->mutex);
- LIST_FOR_EACH (addr_dummy, node, &netdev->addrs) {
- cnt++;
- }
+ cnt = ovs_list_size(&netdev->addrs);
if (!cnt) {
err = EADDRNOTAVAIL;
goto out;
@@ -1688,7 +1686,8 @@ pkt_list_delete(struct ovs_list *l)
}
static void
-addr_list_delete(struct ovs_list *l) {
+addr_list_delete(struct ovs_list *l)
+{
struct netdev_addr_dummy *addr_dummy;
LIST_FOR_EACH_POP (addr_dummy, node, l) {
---
What do you think?
If that looks good to you, I can fold that in before applying.
Eelco, if you still want to review the set I can wait with applying.
Just let me know.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
