On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:24 AM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Let's separate DPDK compilation from the rest of OVS build: > - this avoids multiple jobs building DPDK in parallel, which especially > affects builds in the dpdk-latest branch,
Err, this patch actually breaks dpdk-latest since the hash does not depend on DPDK_VER and GHA does not allow overwritting an existing cache entry. I'll wait a bit before trying to solve this and see if others have an opinion on the approach at least. > - we separate concerns about DPDK build requirements from OVS build > requirements, like python dependencies, > - building DPDK does not depend on how we will link OVS against it, so we > can use a single cache entry regardless of DPDK_SHARED option, > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> -- David Marchand _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev