On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:24 AM David Marchand
<david.march...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Let's separate DPDK compilation from the rest of OVS build:
> - this avoids multiple jobs building DPDK in parallel, which especially
>   affects builds in the dpdk-latest branch,

Err, this patch actually breaks dpdk-latest since the hash does not
depend on DPDK_VER and GHA does not allow overwritting an existing
cache entry.
I'll wait a bit before trying to solve this and see if others have an
opinion on the approach at least.


> - we separate concerns about DPDK build requirements from OVS build
>   requirements, like python dependencies,
> - building DPDK does not depend on how we will link OVS against it, so we
>   can use a single cache entry regardless of DPDK_SHARED option,
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>

-- 
David Marchand

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to