Could you please add a rationale for the change in the commit message?
Maybe the NEWS file should be updated to reflect the behavior changes
after the series (tunnel interfaces not set for TC; TC applied to
interfaces on the same LS...)



On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:45 AM Lorenzo Bianconi
<lorenzo.bianc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Remove tunnel interfaces from egress list in order to not shape them.
>
> Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129742
> Tested-by: Rodolfo Alonso <ralon...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianc...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  controller/binding.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/controller/binding.c b/controller/binding.c
> index 5df62baef..09cf00af3 100644
> --- a/controller/binding.c
> +++ b/controller/binding.c
> @@ -1889,15 +1889,6 @@ build_local_bindings(struct binding_ctx_in *b_ctx_in,
>                  smap_replace(b_ctx_out->local_iface_ids, iface_rec->name,
>                               iface_id);
>              }
> -
> -            /* Check if this is a tunnel interface. */
> -            if (smap_get(&iface_rec->options, "remote_ip")) {
> -                const char *tunnel_iface
> -                    = smap_get(&iface_rec->status, "tunnel_egress_iface");
> -                if (tunnel_iface) {
> -                    sset_add(b_ctx_out->egress_ifaces, tunnel_iface);
> -                }
> -            }
>          }
>      }
>  }
> --
> 2.39.2
>

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to