ons. 24. mai 2023, 21:31 skrev Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@ovn.org>: > On 5/23/23 12:39, Frode Nordahl wrote: > > <snip> > > > int > > tc_transact(struct ofpbuf *request, struct ofpbuf **replyp) > > { > > int error = nl_transact(NETLINK_ROUTE, request, replyp); > > ofpbuf_uninit(request); > > + > > + if (!error && replyp && !(*replyp)->size) { > > Not a full review, but shouldn't we also check that *replyp != NULL > here? This can happen, for example, if nl_pool_alloc() fails. >
In the event of `nl_pool_alloc()` failing, would not error also have a value? In any case, it probably would not hurt with a extra check before dereferencing the pointer, thank you for pointing it out. -- Frode Nordahl > + COVERAGE_INC(tc_transact_eagain); > > + /* We replicate the behavior of `nl_transact` for error > conditions and > > + * free any allocations before setting the 'replyp' buffer to > NULL. */ > > + ofpbuf_delete(*replyp); > > + *replyp = NULL; > > + return EAGAIN; > > + } > > + > > return error; > > } > > > > Bets regards, Ilya Maximets. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev