On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 4:16 AM Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/10/23 20:10, Han Zhou wrote:
> > The test case is unstable because there are many factors that can impact
> > the number of recomputes. For example, when northd updates both NB and
> > SB, both sides have in-flight transactions, and if the SB notification
> > comes back before the NB transaction (for updating nb_cfg) completes,
> > ovn-northd falls back to recompute because idl_txn for NB is not
> > available, while if the NB notification comes back first it won't
> > trigger recompute because the nb_cfg columns are omitted for alert.
> >
> > To avoid the instability of the test case, this patch modifies it to
> > verify the best case (also the most common scenario), by running the
> > test multiple (10) times and making sure at least 70% of the time all
> > the recompute counters match expectation.
> >
> > (The recompute triggered by in-flight transactions will be improved
> > later and the success rate in the test can be adjusted accordingly.)
> >
> > Reported-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Han Zhou <hz...@ovn.org>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2: wait ports up and sync after each port binding, to avoid race.
> > v2 -> v3: refactor and test case and use a probability based test
strategy
> > to ensure the test stability (see commit message).
>
> Neat, thanks for fixing this!  The only thing with this approach is that
> the test case takes quite long to execute 30s on my system.  Luckily we
> don't have too many tests like this so:
>
> Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara <dce...@redhat.com>
>
Thanks Dumitru. That sounds really slow. It is faster on my computer
(<10s), not too bad. If we really want it to be faster we can reduce the
number of runs. I applied it to main for now (I did see several CI failures
because of this test).

Regards,
Han

> Regards,
> Dumitru
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to